Tudor Batin vs Melih Anavatan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 09:40 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Batin vs M. Anavatan

ROU
0
Win
Played
1
Win

TUR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Batin 0 - 1 Anavatan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tudor Batin winning 1 and Melih Anavatan winning 2. The last match between Melih Anavatan and Tudor Batin was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Melih Anavatan getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Batin | 0 |
| Anavatan | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Sharm ElSheikh(11-05-25)
T. Batin vs M. Anavatan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.82% (10-7) | Career Total W/L | 45.45% (30-36) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Batin vs M. Anavatan Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Tudor Batin excels with a 42.40% success rate on second serves recently, outperforming Melih Anavatan's 39.80%.
- Return Game Stats: On return, Batin dominates first serves with a 28.47% win rate, whereas Anavatan leads in second serve returns at 47.44%.
- Pressure Handling: Melih Anavatan is slightly better at saving breakpoints, achieving a 48.05% success rate compared to Batin's 44.21%.
- Match Performance: Over the past year, Batin boasts a higher match win rate of 69.23%, while Anavatan holds a 51.02% win rate.
- Strongest Surface: Both players excel on hard courts, each achieving a win rate of 78%.
- Opponent Quality: Anavatan has faced tougher opponents on average, with opponents ranked 186.61 compared to Batin's average opponent rank of 254.
- Deciding Set Performance: In tight matches going into a deciding set, Batin has triumphed in 50% of his matches, whereas Anavatan has only succeeded in 31%.
- Which player is likely to hold an edge in crucial points? Batin's proficiency in first serve returns and deciding sets might be significant.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
Tudor Batin has showcased a notable edge in several important aspects of recent tennis performance metrics. Particularly, his ability to win on first serve returns stands out as a critical advantage. Moreover, his impressive success rate in deciding set matches highlights his resilience under pressure.
Conversely, while Melih Anavatan demonstrates strong second serve return capabilities and better breakpoint saving statistics, the broader performance overview and surface preferences align more favorably with Batin.
The players' past performances on hard courts are equally matched statistically, but Batin’s consistency in winning matches, along with his proficiency against lower-ranked opponents, combines to form a case for his advantage in this matchup.
Taking into account these comparative stats and the current competitive landscape, Tudor Batin appears to be the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Tudor Batin vs Melih Anavatan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Batin vs M. Anavatan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 16 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:0:48 | Average Match Time | 2:0:48 |
| 54% (40/74) | 1st Serve % | 55% (50/91) |
| 63% (25/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (29/50) |
| 24% (8/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (21/41) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 64% (7/11) |
| 45% (41/91) | Return Points Win % | 55% (41/74) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Batin Recent Matches Played
M. Anavatan Recent Matches Played

T. Batin vs M. Anavatan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.82% (10/7) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (30/36) |
| 58.97% (23/16) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.70% (75/79) |
| 55.36% (186/150) | Games Win/Loss | 50.51% (746/731) |
| 70.00% (7/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.78% (26/19) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 19.05% (4/17) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 29 | Aces Total | 39 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 56 | Total Double Faults | 67 |
| 1:13:34 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 189.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 162.74 |
| 57% (456/797) | 1st Serve % | 56% (651/1156) |
| 67% (304/456) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (416/651) |
| 49% (167/341) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (219/505) |
| 53% (51/96) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (50/106) |
| 45% (356/794) | Return Points Win % | 38% (427/1112) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Futures W/L | 45.45% (30/36) |
| 59% (10/17) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (30/66) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 40% (2/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 32% (7/22) |
| 90% (10/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (33/27) |
| 10% (10/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (33/6) |
| 14% (7/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (33/3) |